I'm considering getting a pair, and have narrowed my choices down to the original RunAmoc or the Rambler. My primary uses would be running and hiking in cold weather, especially while it's raining or wet out. I really, REALLY like the idea of the sheepskin footbed in the Rambler, but am concerned about the durability and traction of the sole. To me they look like the soles on my original Lunas, which just don't cut it on some of the steeper hikes that I do (I've tried, and been really glad I had my Treks as a backup). But then the "trail" soles on the RunAmoc don't like like they'd provide all that much traction on really rough trails, either. Does anyone have experience hiking in either of these models?
Also, what is sizing like? I see that they come in different widths, but then it also sounds like the toe box is wide to start with. I AM more comfortable with men's VFFs...the women's styles with closed tops, such as the Treks, are too narrow for me. Does that mean I should get the wide?